!Beta testing!

[MrZ]

Hia:))

This Was Good News, best in a loooong time,,,

was sterted to wondered


tnx ptaczek and sending tnx to PPK too :))
NICE work guys

Z ya

[toras]

Originally posted by ptaczek
For now, there is nothing new to test and more over, I've decided (in order to simplify things) to release next beta as a Public Beta )
Thanx to PPK's help a new beta is in progress with proper EXTENDEDPROTOCOL support and with editable DC tags support. Everything else is still unclear but I hope it will be a little better than the previous beta

cheers

*clap my hands and takes a few dancesteps on my livingroom-floor. ;D

[Optimus]

Hi Ptokax is it possible to have something like IP = GetIPByName(nick) to get the IP of a Online user.

I can think off some reasons to have it it build in.

Example:

when using Unban(what)  i can unban users (nick/ip) with 1 single command in a verry simple way without to much code or logs (or whatever)

Hope you see some in it, Greetingz Opti

[Seredo]

Hi Ptokax is it possible to have something like 2 poorts like 411 and 511 is very usefull
i hoop you can fix it  :D

[Typhoon]

well dont know if someone have beat this one , but i'm still gonna post it ....  great to hear about the public Beta Ptaczek and hope its even better than  build 15.25

[17:12:23] ------------------------------------------------------------
[17:12:23] Current stats:
[17:12:23] ------------------------------------------------------------
[17:12:23] Version: PtokaX DC Hub 0.3.3.0 build 15.25 [debug] built on Dec 15 2003 18:48:35
[17:12:23] Uptime: 26 days, 20 hours, 9 minutes
[17:12:23] Users (Max/Peak/Logged) : 200 / 148 / 83
[17:12:23] Unknown commands: 17 x
[17:12:23] PM commands: 5633 x
[17:12:23] Key commands: 4639460 x
[17:12:23] MyINFO commands: 4715942 x
[17:12:23] ValidateNick commands: 4638541 x
[17:12:23] GetINFO commands: 1579312 x
[17:12:23] Password commands: 1106 x
[17:12:23] Version commands: 4629253 x
[17:12:23] UserIP commands: 3 x
[17:12:23] GetNickList commands: 4617312 x
[17:12:23] Search commands: 327372 x
[17:12:23] SR commands: 463677 x
[17:12:23] CTM commands: 481141 x
[17:12:23] RevCTM commands: 429880 x
[17:12:23] ------------------------------------------------------------
[17:12:24] CPU usage (60 seconds average): 16.7%
[17:12:24] MEM usage: 1732 kB
[17:12:24] ------------------------------------------------------------
[17:12:24] SendRestsPeak: 2
[17:12:24] RecvRestsPeak: 3
[17:12:24] Listing end.

running on a stand alone server PII@200mhz :o)

[DEEP-GOA]

Originally posted by ptaczek
For now, there is nothing new to test and more over, I've decided (in order to simplify things) to release next beta as a Public Beta )
Thanx to PPK's help a new beta is in progress with proper EXTENDEDPROTOCOL support and with editable DC tags support. Everything else is still unclear but I hope it will be a little better than the previous beta

cheers

*bigsmile*

really good news yeahhh

[Skrollster]

Hi ptacek!

There is one thing in the latest builds, don't remember then you did change it but it was then you improved the error handling.

Now the call function in lua doesn't work as it should..

- call (func, arg [, mode [, errhandler]])

Calls function func with the arguments given by the table arg. The call is equivalent to
func(arg[1], arg[2], ..., arg[n]) where n is the result of getn(arg) (see ?6.1).

All results from func are simply returned by call.

By default, if an error occurs during the call to func, the error is propagated. If the string
mode contains "x", then the call is protected. In this mode, function call does not propagate an error, regardless of what happens during the call. Instead, it returns nil to signal the error (besides calling the appropriated error handler).

If errhandler is provided, the error function _ERRORMESSAGE is temporarily set to errhandler, while func runs. In particular, if errhandler is nil, no error messages will be issued during the execution of the called function.

as you might understand it is the errorhandler that is override by your new way of handling the errors..

could this be changed?

[Alexei]

Hi guys!
Havent heard of me for a loong time huh?

WEll... im not even sure what are we testing now? cuz all the betas i get are bug -free in my case... well last 2-3 in any case...

Public Beta sounds really nice :D

Gee... feels good to be back ...hehe...

[ptaczek]

Originally posted by Skrollster
Hi ptacek!

There is one thing in the latest builds, don't remember then you did change it but it was then you improved the error handling.

Now the call function in lua doesn't work as it should..

- call (func, arg [, mode [, errhandler]])

Calls function func with the arguments given by the table arg. The call is equivalent to
func(arg[1], arg[2], ..., arg[n]) where n is the result of getn(arg) (see ?6.1).

All results from func are simply returned by call.

By default, if an error occurs during the call to func, the error is propagated. If the string
mode contains "x", then the call is protected. In this mode, function call does not propagate an error, regardless of what happens during the call. Instead, it returns nil to signal the error (besides calling the appropriated error handler).

If errhandler is provided, the error function _ERRORMESSAGE is temporarily set to errhandler, while func runs. In particular, if errhandler is nil, no error messages will be issued during the execution of the called function.

as you might understand it is the errorhandler that is override by your new way of handling the errors..

could this be changed?

Hmm, what I did is override of _ALERT instead of _ERRORMESSAGE, but it seems that both should be override :) I'll try it. Thanx for idea!

[Skrollster]

I like the idea of being able to choose for my self if I want to prompt the error or not...

[MrZ]

Hiaa:))

So were on track again :)

Can we pls have the !unban command unban even the timebaned too.

Or at least a way to make a new command for it

Z ya

[Dyzan]

Originally posted by MrZ
Hiaa:))

So were on track again

Can we pls have the !unban command unban even the timebaned too.

Or at least a way to make a new command for it

Z ya

I want a tempbanlist  command. And as you said MrZ. Why shulden't we have a !unban for both timeban, temban and normal ban! That funktion has existed long time now in for example Neo Modus HubSoft.

I think many agree in this.

/Dyzan

[kepp]

yes

[Typhoon]

and maybe a frmHub:SetHubBotName()  

could be nice it were custom while hub is running ! ..
if not we will survive .. have a blast ptaczek ;-)

and i agree on th !unbantime /  or something

[kepp]

Originally posted by Typhoon?
and maybe a frmHub:SetHubBotName()  

What for?

you already have frmHub:RegBot(name)

Or do you mean to change BotName?
That can be done with a few lines anyhow

[Alexei]

Hi, like ive wrote b4 -- i was a way for a while...
the site gives me:
CGI Error
The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of HTTP headers. The headers it did return are:

I wonder why...
Bzway... its kinda sad that you are comming up with the ideas that i wrote a long time ago to Ptaczek... just he never read them i guess :(

Anyway... I just wanted to know what?ve happand to the site?

Regards.

[Typhoon]

Originally posted by kepp

Originally posted by Typhoon?
and maybe a frmHub:SetHubBotName()  

What for?

you already have frmHub:RegBot(name)

Or do you mean to change BotName?
That can be done with a few lines anyhow

yep for scriptet change of bot name!!

+chbotname [kepp]  

 ;)

[[BiH]ElviR]

Hi!

Can I also be a Beta Tester?

 :D

[Blackfox]

Excellent to hear... very very happy to hear... drinks a toast to the developers and all that...

ok... with the formalities done...

Where is it?

BF

[Tarot]

i hoop the new ptokax is comming soon so ptokax can beat yhub

info from hublist.org

Y-Hub

1982 hubs
309152 users
155.98 users/hub
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

PtokaX

1585 hubs
101633 users
64.12 users/hub

[[T-G-T]M@sto]

Originally posted by Tarot
i hoop the new ptokax is comming soon so ptokax can beat yhub

info from hublist.org

Y-Hub

1982 hubs
309152 users
155.98 users/hub
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

PtokaX

1585 hubs
101633 users
64.12 users/hub

Dont worry no matter how many Yhubs there is PTokax is a winder

[Tarot]

Originally posted by [T-G-T]M@sto

Originally posted by Tarot
i hoop the new ptokax is comming soon so ptokax can beat yhub

info from hublist.org

Y-Hub

1982 hubs
309152 users
155.98 users/hub
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

PtokaX

1585 hubs
101633 users
64.12 users/hub

Dont worry no matter how many Yhubs there is PTokax is a winder

jep it is fun to stay number 1

[ptaczek]

Originally posted by Tarot
jep it is fun to stay number 1

Do you think so? :|

[Optimus]

well i think it's more then fun only *lol*

It's hard work and hard work and more

[angelsanges]

ptaczek..................WOW MY IDOL!