Latest development news

[VidFamne]

Is there by any chance a possibility to have two "modes" of function OnExit()
Like; OnExitScript() - restart script while hub still running and Users still connected
and OnExitHub() - restart hub and Users are disconnected

[plop]

Originally posted by VidFamne
Is there by any chance a possibility to have two "modes" of function OnExit()
Like; OnExitScript() - restart script while hub still running and Users still connected
and OnExitHub() - restart hub and Users are disconnected

you can detect this on function Main, in the case of a script restart you can let it check if there are users in the hub.
if so you have a script restart.

plop

[bastya_elvtars]

Originally posted by plop

Originally posted by VidFamne
Is there by any chance a possibility to have two "modes" of function OnExit()
Like; OnExitScript() - restart script while hub still running and Users still connected
and OnExitHub() - restart hub and Users are disconnected

you can detect this on function Main, in the case of a script restart you can let it check if there are users in the hub.
if so you have a script restart.

plop

but what if he wants to do things BEFORE it?

[Herodes]

things like what ? I am just beeing curious ..

[bastya_elvtars]

Originally posted by Herodes
things like what ? I am just beeing curious ..

saving data? hm?

[plop]

in both cases you need 2 close/save all script data.
just on a script restart you could/can open some of the open data again.
but this can be detected on function Main.

plop

[VidFamne]

Yepp you right plop.
But it's a kind of a hack.
It should be neat with a function corresponding to
restart script resp. restart hub.
But thats only my two cent.....

[plop]

Originally posted by VidFamne
Yepp you right plop.
But it's a kind of a hack.
It should be neat with a function corresponding to
restart script resp. restart hub.
But thats only my two cent..... :D

your right it would be nicer, but for now (maby future) it's a solution.

plop

[BoJlk]

Can you tell what is the latest and the stable ProtaX version?
i'm using ProtaX v0.3.3.0 build 15.25 [debug]
and that's not the officially release one!

[Troubadour]

Originally posted by PPK

Originally posted by Troubadour
Can the Permanent Ban be like the Registered User part?
So you can add individual names or ips without using dc!

Is this

Ban(IP)
NickBan(Nick)
TempBan(IP)
TimeBan(IP, TimeInMinutes)

what you want ??? :rolleyes:

Originally posted by Troubadour
Will there be a inbuilt kick filter?

I try it with option to disable :)

Originally posted by bastya_elvtars
also what i noticed is that the banlist is hmm... underdetailed - is this already solved?

Not solved, banlist always need complete rewrite  X(

For the permanent ban part i also mean a new button for adding a single name or ip.
For the kickfilter i mean a part where certain words can be stored and when the same word is found in the share (a file) that the user will automaticaly be kicked or banned.
Also a spamfilter would be usefull.
PPK if you like an example just give me a pm and i'll show it to you!

Regards,
Troubadour

[PPK]

Originally posted by Troubadour
For the permanent ban part i also mean a new button for adding a single name or ip.

Try double click in perm bans :]

Originally posted by Troubadour
For the kickfilter i mean a part where certain words can be stored and when the same word is found in the share (a file) that the user will automaticaly be kicked or banned.

Hub don't know user share, maybe if hub catch bad word in $SR but this working only for active users ($SR go through hub only from active users to passive)

[plop]

Originally posted by PPK

Originally posted by Troubadour
For the kickfilter i mean a part where certain words can be stored and when the same word is found in the share (a file) that the user will automaticaly be kicked or banned.

Hub don't know user share, maybe if hub catch bad word in $SR but this working only for active users ($SR go through hub only from active users to passive) :(

1st of all like you say it isn't full proof.
2nd why waste resources on the hub side when clients like DCM can do it a lot better.
but then still i don't like it.
i lost count on the amount of times i got kicked for "antichildporn.lua".

plop

[blackwings]

it would be nice if you could see which script that banned a user in the perm ban list, like this =
76.123.***.**              nick [deflood4.5.4.lua]

[Troubadour]

Could you create a searchfilter instead?

Regards,
Troubadour

[BeeR]

Originally posted by BoJlk
Can you tell what is the latest and the stable ProtaX version?
i'm using ProtaX v0.3.3.0 build 15.25 [debug]
and that's not the officially release one!

A true friend gave me 15,30 debug ,, now i belive in Ptokax again ,, it's awesome :D

[imby]

what's so good about it?

[Psycho_Chihuahua]

hmmm seeming though 15.30 has obviosly leaked, why not  post it somewhere? Just neglect support  
i'm still using 15.8 (runs better than 15.25 on my puter) and would love to test again  

well i know the answer to this anyway, but it's still worth a try

[Handyman]

hmm just found Build 15.46  ?(
But i think its a fake, some things are striped out. 8o

[[NL]Pur]

i don't think beta's are full produkts, so don't expect them to be the same, or bug free. Beta's are to try out stuff, a newer version number doesn't mean it's better, only different and released on a later date.

[plop]

Originally posted by Psycho_Chihuahua
hmmm seeming though 15.30 has obviosly leaked, why not  post it somewhere? Just neglect support  :D
i'm still using 15.8 (runs better than 15.25 on my puter) and would love to test again  :D

well i know the answer to this anyway, but it's still worth a try

you found 0.3.3.0 15.25.

Originally posted by Handyman
hmm just found Build 15.46  ?(
But i think its a fake, some things are striped out. 8o

and thats 0.3.2.4 aka icecube.

plop

[Psycho_Chihuahua]

Originally posted by plop

Originally posted by Psycho_Chihuahua
hmmm seeming though 15.30 has obviosly leaked, why not  post it somewhere? Just neglect support  :D
i'm still using 15.8 (runs better than 15.25 on my puter) and would love to test again  :D

well i know the answer to this anyway, but it's still worth a try

you found 0.3.3.0 15.25.

plop

Hmm then how come the one Titeled 15.8 runs smoother on my puter than the one titeled 15.25?

Oh well whatever, can hardley wait for a new Version to come along

[plop]

Originally posted by Psycho_Chihuahua
Hmm then how come the one Titeled 15.8 runs smoother on my puter than the one titeled 15.25?

if you read back in this topic you can find that on 15.25 pta tryed something new on the memory handling.
this turned out badly.

plop

[bastya_elvtars]

Originally posted by plop

Originally posted by Psycho_Chihuahua
Hmm then how come the one Titeled 15.8 runs smoother on my puter than the one titeled 15.25?

if you read back in this topic you can find that on 15.25 pta tryed something new on the memory handling.
this turned out badly.

plop

huh? could you expand this a bit?

[plop]

Originally posted by bastya_elvtars

Originally posted by plop

Originally posted by Psycho_Chihuahua
Hmm then how come the one Titeled 15.8 runs smoother on my puter than the one titeled 15.25?

if you read back in this topic you can find that on 15.25 pta tryed something new on the memory handling.
this turned out badly.

plop

huh? could you expand this a bit?

a while back this crazy guy loaded up 2400 users into 0.3.3.0.
thats not bad @ all, but i kicked 1200 of them @ once.
on this move ptokax should have free-ed up about 40-50% of the memory it used, but this didn't happen.
this is 1 of the events which caused the trail on 15.25, just it didn't solve the bug like pta hoped for.

1 of the notes about 15.25 is that it should be tested on hub's with 800 or more users.

plop

[bastya_elvtars]

it really does not free memory. does 15.18 do?