Lucifer 6.6.6 - Page 3
 

News:

29 December 2022 - PtokaX 0.5.3.0 (20th anniversary edition) released...
11 April 2017 - PtokaX 0.5.2.2 released...
8 April 2015 Anti child and anti pedo pr0n scripts are not allowed anymore on this board!
28 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 for Windows 10 IoT released...
3 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 released...
16 August 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.0 released...
1 August 2015 - Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX ended. Clearly nobody want ADC support...
30 June 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.1.0 released...
30 April 2015 Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX
26 April 2015 New support hub!
20 February 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.0.3 released...
13 April 2014 - PtokaX 0.5.0.2 released...
23 March 2014 - PtokaX testing version 0.5.0.1 build 454 is available.
04 March 2014 - PtokaX.org sites were temporary down because of DDOS attacks and issues with hosting service provider.

Main Menu

Lucifer 6.6.6

Started by jiten, 14 March, 2006, 19:51:22

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Apocalypse


jiten

First post has been updated with some fixes to the code.

Sjeminov

#52
i have try some thing's with a unreged user.
he send me a pm with a link they in the blovked list stayed but it lucifer blocked in pm. ;(
in main he say it and he has got a ban so in main works it well ;)
Can you look at that ? So that they block pm to ??


Alexinno

#53
Quote from: Sjeminov on 14 December, 2006, 14:20:37
i have try some thing's with a unreged user.
he send me a pm with a link they in the blovked list stayed but it lucifer blocked in pm. ;(
in main he say it and he has got a ban so in main works it well ;)
Cahey bn you look at that ? So that they block pm to ??

are you saying , that he send you a link in PM , and that link is listed in your bad advertising , lucifer doesn't kicked/banned him?
if yes, that is because Users conversating with ops don't get kicked

Josecar

I am confused about the timer of Lucifer 6.6.6

OnTimer = function()
   -- tabAdvert cleaner
   for i, v in pairs(tSettings.tabAdvert) do
      if (tSettings.tabAdvert.iClock > os.clock() + 60) then tSettings.tabAdvert = nil end
   end

As I see it, tSettings.tabAdvertiClock has stored an os.clock() value previous than now.

So, when will be that value > GREATER than actual os.clock() value more 60 ?

May be the table is changed in another part that I had not found?

I've looked for Multiline Antiadvertise script of OpiumVolage, and this is the same there.
Surely I am misunderstandig something, can't be wrong in all places. So, what I'm missing?
Please excuse me if I am asking a foolness.

Thanks in advance.
Jose Carlos




bastya_elvtars

Shouldn't it be if (tSettings.tabAdvert.iClock -os.clock() > 60) ?
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Josecar

There your are substracting a bigger number, -os.clock() now is bigger than it was before  - the result will bes negative.

As I see it, this should be

if (os.clock() > tabAdvert.iClock + 60) then tabAdvert = nil end

if actual secs are bigger in more than 60 secs than stored secs.

If there is no other thing that we can't see, lucifer 6.6.6 has never cleaned that table, nor did Multinline Antiadvertise in lua4.

bastya_elvtars

Yep, it should be tabAdvert.iClock-os.clock(), sorry.

Bloody hangover. ;-)
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

-SkA-

Hmm I think there is a bug in PM scanner.

If a user talk in PM with a user that contains in nick a forbidden word (example [ITA]rewww ---> www not allowed) than script trigger it and kick user  ;D

[11:55:33] <????? ????> Control: <ready> (82.57.28.xxx) said in Main Chat: [RO][ar]slowwww - Triggered by: www.

He was just talking in PM with that user.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk