0.3.4.0j
 

News:

29 December 2022 - PtokaX 0.5.3.0 (20th anniversary edition) released...
11 April 2017 - PtokaX 0.5.2.2 released...
8 April 2015 Anti child and anti pedo pr0n scripts are not allowed anymore on this board!
28 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 for Windows 10 IoT released...
3 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 released...
16 August 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.0 released...
1 August 2015 - Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX ended. Clearly nobody want ADC support...
30 June 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.1.0 released...
30 April 2015 Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX
26 April 2015 New support hub!
20 February 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.0.3 released...
13 April 2014 - PtokaX 0.5.0.2 released...
23 March 2014 - PtokaX testing version 0.5.0.1 build 454 is available.
04 March 2014 - PtokaX.org sites were temporary down because of DDOS attacks and issues with hosting service provider.

Main Menu

0.3.4.0j

Started by PPK, 28 May, 2006, 16:37:23

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PPK

New testing version, maybe last before release :P
1 ) With Lua 5.0.2.
2 ) With Lua 5.1.

Full online PtokaX changelog is available in Wiki.
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

bastya_elvtars

Call the final 0.3.5.0, it is worth it.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

PPK

Why not 0.4.0.0  ??? ;D
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

6Marilyn6Manson6

Why not 1.0.0.0 hihiihihihih  ;D ;D ;D ;D

bastya_elvtars

Quote from: PPK on 28 May, 2006, 17:37:39
Why not 0.4.0.0  ??? ;D

I did not wanna be impolite. :-)

Just wanted to suggest the usual versioning convention. :-)

Microversion=bugfix etc.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

blackwings

PPK, could you explain what this does? =
Added: Max limit (16) for script bots to disalloq fake users.


PPK

#6
On RegBot it check if here is already 16 scripted bots on hub, and if yes then not add it. I added it to disallow hubs (like the one on hublist.org running PtokaX and have 5000 users, but only 40 real) to fake users  ::)
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

-SkA-

Quote from: PPK on 28 May, 2006, 20:03:59
On RegBot it check if here is already 16 scripted bots on hub, and if yes then not add it. I added it to disallow hubs (like the one on hublist.org running PtokaX and have 5000 users, but only 40 real) to fake users? ::)

LOL PPK: ssshhhh  :-X  :-X      ;D  ;D
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

-SkA-

Talking seriously: it's a hublist.org pinger problem, not Ptokax.

That pinger checks also BOTs.....others hublist (as dreamland) don't do that.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

GeceBekcisi

Other hublists doesn't ping your hub as hublist.org does,
they retrieve your user count if you enable hublist registration in PtokaX
and PtokaX reports only real users to hublists..

That's absolutely not a honest way -SkA-, you know it...


But, if someone wants to fake users; script bots is not the only way..



Though, thanks PPK, for this step against fakers  ;)
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

-SkA-

Quote from: GeceBekcisi on 28 May, 2006, 20:47:07
Other hublists doesn't ping your hub as hublist.org does,
they retrieve your user count if you enable hublist registration in PtokaX
and PtokaX reports only real users to hublists..

That's absolutely not a honest way -SkA-, you know it...

I perfectly know that's not correct.

Come on guys, It was only a try to re-populate my hub since it was included in that list and thanks to that bad person I lost all my users.

btw, now "fake-hub" is closed.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

GeceBekcisi

Some of my users complained about the stuff below, and switching back to 0.3.4.0i solved that..

What may be wrong PPK?

[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:18] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:20] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:20] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:57:40] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[09:57:40] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:59:41] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[09:59:41] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[10:01:58] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[10:02:20] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

-SkA-

It also happened to me one day with d1 : an hub restart solved the problem...

Take also note there was a bandwidth issue on my server that day.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

GeceBekcisi

Yeah, hub restart resolves for a while, but users start bitching again.. We were being DDoS'ed since last 12 hrs; so I'll check if these happen while we're being attacked
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

GeceBekcisi

What's interesting is, we ARE being DDoS'ed at the moment too but with 0.3.4.0i0, no one receives search spam..   :o
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

PPK

I checked all changes from i to j and here is no change related to deflood  :(
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

GeceBekcisi

I didnt blame deflood functionality for search spams; we were being flooded or DDoS'ed by spoofed, type 3 ICMP packets.

And what I was trying to say was 0.3.4.0i0 didn't lag searches where 0.3.4.0j0 did.
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

blackwings

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 14:35:06
I checked all changes from i to j and here is no change related to deflood  :(
isn't it possible that you made something wrong when you did these changes? =

Fixed: Not working "no main chat deflood" and "no private message deflood" for multiline messages (thx ']['yphoon? for report).
Fixed: Crash on bad $SR returned to UDP.
Changed: Complete rewrite of data queues.


PPK

#18
These changes are already included in i version  ::)

Quote from: GeceBekcisi on 29 May, 2006, 14:45:54
And what I was trying to say was 0.3.4.0i0 didn't lag searches where 0.3.4.0j0 did.
Both have same interval to send searches, and no changes from i to j  ::)
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

blackwings

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 17:01:22
These changes are already included in i version  ::)
I know, what I meant was that maybe you made something wrong when you made those changes.


bastya_elvtars

FYI, ICMP has nothing to do with active search results.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

PPK

#21
I am check 3 times changes from i to j, and no change related to search requests found :(
I am check things related to search and everything looks ok.
GeceBekcisi from what client is this log, and running this client in passive or active mode  ??? (looks like passive because all search spams are active)  ::) Is here any log of data received by client from hub ??? It looks like in DC++ is spam more than 7 searches in 5 seconds :o
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

blackwings

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 21:36:25
I am check 3 times changes from i to j, and no change related to search requests found :(
I am check things related to search and everything looks ok.
GeceBekcisi said he also notice this in i,
so check for things changed between h - i ( or ad - i).


ConejoDelMal

i think the problem is not search related, but cpu and memory consumption, I also just got a lot of search spam warnings, as I checked the server, ptokax was using 98% of my cpu, and over 390.000K of memory.

*edited
running j1
Rede-DC Comunidade Portuguesa de DC

GeceBekcisi

Quote from: bastya_elvtars on 29 May, 2006, 19:18:36
FYI, ICMP has nothing to do with active search results.

Yeah that's true; unless they flow to my server like crazy and cause my server to lag..


Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 21:36:25
GeceBekcisi from what client is this log, and running this client in passive or active mode? ??? (looks like passive because all search spams are active)? ::) Is here any log of data received by client from hub ??? It looks like in DC++ is spam more than 7 searches in 5 seconds :o

This log belongs to DC++ 0.674 as well as many other versions (my operators got reports from lots of people; those happened while I was away). This client is running in active mode. I don't have any log except the log above since I didn't experience that. Any more questions?


Quote from: blackwings on 29 May, 2006, 21:42:20
GeceBekcisi said he also notice this in i, so check for things changed between h - i ( or ad - i).

I think that's just a coincidence; I don't blame 0.3.4.0j0 at all...


Quote from: ConejoDelMal on 29 May, 2006, 21:54:09
i think the problem is not search related, but cpu and memory consumption, I also just got a lot of search spam warnings, as I checked the server, ptokax was using 98% of my cpu, and over 390.000K of memory.

*edited
running j1

Couldn't agree more; but as I said before it's interesting that 0.3.4.0i0 didn't cause that under the same conditions..
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk