Suggestion for simplifying the API
 

News:

29 December 2022 - PtokaX 0.5.3.0 (20th anniversary edition) released...
11 April 2017 - PtokaX 0.5.2.2 released...
8 April 2015 Anti child and anti pedo pr0n scripts are not allowed anymore on this board!
28 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 for Windows 10 IoT released...
3 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 released...
16 August 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.0 released...
1 August 2015 - Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX ended. Clearly nobody want ADC support...
30 June 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.1.0 released...
30 April 2015 Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX
26 April 2015 New support hub!
20 February 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.0.3 released...
13 April 2014 - PtokaX 0.5.0.2 released...
23 March 2014 - PtokaX testing version 0.5.0.1 build 454 is available.
04 March 2014 - PtokaX.org sites were temporary down because of DDOS attacks and issues with hosting service provider.

Main Menu

Suggestion for simplifying the API

Started by Herodes, 04 March, 2006, 17:06:38

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Herodes

Why do we need to have two functions like
frmHub:Get<SettingName>();
frmHub:Set<SettingName>( value );

where it could be just
fmrHub:SettingName( [value] )

?

Does it make Ptx work faster or simply to make it all look pragmatic ?

bastya_elvtars

Already requested, has been rejected cause it would slow the C part down. I was not strong enough to convince PPK.  :-[
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Herodes

Quote from: bastya_elvtars on 04 March, 2006, 17:11:57
Already requested, has been rejected cause it would slow the C part down. I was not strong enough to convince PPK.  :-[
Can you recall the title of the thread that you requested it ?

bastya_elvtars

I requested it through IM, as far as I can remember.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk