PtokaX forum

Archive => RoboCop => AllInOne Scripts => Archived 5.1 boards => RoboCop - Support => Topic started by: Vmon on 27 October, 2007, 23:39:34

Title: New Problem
Post by: Vmon on 27 October, 2007, 23:39:34
I am running PtokaX 0.3.5.1 lua 5.1.1, while running RoboCop 10.023.

I, along with the ops/mods, do not have the ability to use the Inbuilt Kick function; only through Robocop.  Within PtokaX, all ops and mods are "kick enabled."  The same is true within Robocop.

Here is the message:  *** Inbuild client kick is disabled, use !kick instead!

As was the case with my problem from the other day, is there something simple I am overlooking?????

Thanks again!!!!
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: PPK on 28 October, 2007, 00:06:35
This is caused by Roboshit, you can fix that with removing Robocop :P
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: Vmon on 28 October, 2007, 01:59:53
The same was true with DarkClerk.  What might you suggest?
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: Tw?sT?d-d?v on 28 October, 2007, 09:10:14
PPK is right m8     Its a script problem , Read the change log for robocop and you shud find this ,
- Disabled inbuildkick i just hate that one ;)
This has been the same since robo version 10.02 , and no1 can fix this has its a compiled bot and the maker is god nows where.
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: Rincewind on 28 October, 2007, 10:30:50
Client kick in conjunction with DarkClerk should not be blocked.

It may be disabled in the profiles I ship but it can be re-enabled.
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: Vmon on 28 October, 2007, 14:36:35
All right thanks!  It is frustrating!!  There are things I really like from RoboCop and DarkClerk.  Oh well!

BTW PPK, didn't you take part in the development of Robo??????
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: PPK on 28 October, 2007, 21:58:25
Quote from: Vmon on 28 October, 2007, 14:36:35
BTW PPK, didn't you take part in the development of Robo??????
NO


//EDIT
Removed offtopic posts.
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: PPK on 30 October, 2007, 20:06:28
You hate it, and i am happy that we have some standard operator commands on protocol level. Is not perfect, but is better that nothing like it is in ADC :P
You are only scripter, you don't need to mess in any way with protocol ops commands. PtokaX do it it for you, and he is doing it very good 8)
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: bastya_elvtars on 30 October, 2007, 20:11:13
Quote from: PPK on 30 October, 2007, 20:06:28
You hate it, and i am happy that we have some standard operator commands on protocol level. Is not perfect, but is better that nothing like it is in ADC :P
Indeed, and I know it is not going to be fixed.
Quote from: PPK on 30 October, 2007, 20:06:28You are only scripter, you don't need to mess in any way with protocol ops commands. PtokaX do it it for you, and he is doing it very good 8)

Uh... well, maybe I should reconsider it because tracking of the numbers of the kicks and accordance to ban times has changed with the introduction of SetMan... but will PtokaX attach a reason to the $Kick-derived tempban for example?
Title: Re: New Problem
Post by: PPK on 30 October, 2007, 20:37:07
Quote from: bastya_elvtars on 30 October, 2007, 20:11:13
but will PtokaX attach a reason to the $Kick-derived tempban for example?
Yes, that was introduced with new ban manager in 0.3.4.0 .. +- 2 years ago (it is in changelog) ::)