search passive
 

News:

11 April 2017 - PtokaX 0.5.2.2 released...
8 April 2015 Anti child and anti pedo pr0n scripts are not allowed anymore on this board!
28 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 for Windows 10 IoT released...
3 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 released...
16 August 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.0 released...
1 August 2015 - Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX ended. Clearly nobody want ADC support...
30 June 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.1.0 released...
30 April 2015 Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX
26 April 2015 New support hub!
20 February 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.0.3 released...
13 April 2014 - PtokaX 0.5.0.2 released...
23 March 2014 - PtokaX testing version 0.5.0.1 build 454 is available.
04 March 2014 - PtokaX.org sites were temporary down because of DDOS attacks and issues with hosting service provider.

Main Menu

search passive

Started by Kastor, 27 January, 2007, 22:28:52

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kastor

 exists  one script that is  able to blocking to the passive searches to only block  the users ?

thanks ......

bastya_elvtars

WTF is this? Why do you want to block?
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

bastya_elvtars

Quote from: Mutor on 28 January, 2007, 00:01:28
Perhaps he doesn't want to waste b/w on passive users.
Why do you care?

Because some users cannot do anything to become active, because of their ISPs for instance. That way, such users on his hub may not search, which is another cut-into-freedom-for-bandwidth-saving-purposes-even-with-transparent-outgoing-packet-compression-issue.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Kastor

Mutor thank you so muck!  ;)


bastya_elvtars

Quote from: Mutor on 28 January, 2007, 03:02:06
Cut into freedom? How noble and yet naive.

The greater percentage  passive users are passive
because they are too lazy or stupid to configure a
simple [NAT] or firewall. Thats the simple truth of it.
There are those that cannot change their mode for
reason beyond their control. In either case they put
undue stress on a hub and it's own connection.

It's still an owner choice to govern their hub as they
wish. Will we ever separate the request from our own
opinions? If I so loathe a request I simple don't work
to meet the request. Is that not the better method?

Well, it would be better and it would not be THAT pointless if one kept those users out of the hub completely, because either they would set their connection up properly or beg somehow for access since they cannot change this, because it ain't under their control. And the burden on the hub is not that high, client and server developers have taken care of this, but I agree with that there are too many passive users.
OTOH it all boils down to the ratio theory of mine again, since passive users would have a worse ratio because of the inability to upload to all users, thus they could be forced to become active with ratio control.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Kastor

sorry , i'm trying the script but the search passive they are blocked for all categories(master, mod , op, vip ,reg ,users),
it is possible to only block for the "users"?
I want that only the users they cannot  make searches passive, but remaining catogories they can
thaks


Kastor

thank you so muck , now works correctly  ;)
in This part of code  "string.rep(" ",350)..search" 350 indicates the search in second ?

bastya_elvtars

Quote from: Mutor on 28 January, 2007, 19:54:41
No it represents 350 space charachters

Which is just a little bit more burden than letting the search go. :-P
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk