Print Page - Best DC Clinent

Title: Best DC Clinent
Post by: kash? on 04 August, 2005, 20:12:16

Which is the best DC Client according to u guys ?

Title:
Post by: EMIN3M on 05 August, 2005, 01:26:12

Mine are

DCDM++
R2++ (Special)
StrongDC++
:))

Title: dc++
Post by: ?Tr??T_???? on 05 August, 2005, 10:46:46

i use dc++ 0.674 and its very nice but it takes many memory usage :(

i tried ldc++ takes more memory usege, so i prefer dc++ because the memory usage :P

Title:
Post by: Dessamator on 05 August, 2005, 14:16:26

well, the best client depends on what u want to do with it , u first exclude the buggy clients, and then choose from that, personally i think dc++ is the best for normal users, odc has a user friendly interface, lots of emoticons, but was a bit buggy the last time i used it. The other clients are mainly op clients, and copies of those main ones !

Title:
Post by: [UK]Madman on 05 August, 2005, 14:35:29

I personally use CZDC++ as my standard client, and DCDM as my op client :)

Title:
Post by: blackwings on 05 August, 2005, 14:47:02

QuoteOriginally posted by [UK]Madman
I personally use CZDC++ as my standard client, and DCDM as my op client :)

czdc++ isn't so good anymore when people has op clients that can detect czdc++ even if it emulate DC++.

But DC++ 0.674 and FulDC are good clients :)

Title:
Post by: Pothead on 05 August, 2005, 15:54:02

I know personal mods can detect CZDC, but no public clients can, unless the users bandwidth limiting. Then thats a Limiter in Tag detection, not a CZDC detection. :)

Title:
Post by: PaDDaN on 06 August, 2005, 00:23:38

I use fulDC++ as my regular client
and i use iDC++ 1.3 as OP client

I have never noticed that iDC++ takes a lot of mem.
Runs just fine here :D

Title:
Post by: uffetjur on 06 August, 2005, 17:01:35

have trouble witm my dc++ klient it uses to much CPU especially when hashing files (share +800 GB) needed to lower priority for the client else it locks up the screen

Title:
Post by: Northwind on 06 August, 2005, 22:32:08

i use:

DCDM++
R2++ (027, still include mc buggy what i hate....)

Title:
Post by: Inflictor on 07 August, 2005, 20:57:50

really any mods out are come from only source DC++, unless someone has made it from scratch.

R2++ is a bunch of clients in one app...

so on they all take ideas from each other

one modded client is the same as the next...

I do have some personal favourites.. R2 being it the top.

///

Inflictor

Title:
Post by: Pothead on 07 August, 2005, 22:00:11

QuoteOriginally posted by uffetjur
have trouble witm my dc++ klient it uses to much CPU especially when hashing files (share +800 GB) needed to lower priority for the client else it locks up the screen

Put a lower number in Max Hash Speed

Title:
Post by: bastya_elvtars on 07 August, 2005, 23:58:40

QuoteOriginally posted by Pothead
QuoteOriginally posted by uffetjur
have trouble witm my dc++ klient it uses to much CPU especially when hashing files (share +800 GB) needed to lower priority for the client else it locks up the screen
Put a lower number in Max Hash Speed

At higher transfer speeds it indeed uses a lot of CPU. And it is not a conflict, neither a netcard problem (I tested through the M$ TCP Loopback Interface, it killed the machine @ 14MB/s), this must be a DC++ flaw.

Title:
Post by: 6Marilyn6Manson6 on 24 August, 2005, 05:25:47

QuoteOriginally posted by EMIN3M
Mine are

DCDM++
R2++ (Special)
StrondDC++
:))

StrongDC++ not StrondDC++ :P

Title:
Post by: EMIN3M on 25 August, 2005, 01:37:37

Where does is say that heehee ;)

Title:
Post by: Madman on 25 August, 2005, 02:25:14

QuoteOriginally posted by 6Marilyn6Manson6
QuoteOriginally posted by EMIN3M
Mine are

DCDM++
R2++ (Special)
StrondDC++ <--- Here!
:))

StrongDC++ not StrondDC++ :P <-- and here!

QuoteOriginally posted by EMIN3M
Where does is say that heehee ;)

Hehe.. ;p

Anyway...
StrongDC++ and fulDC for me...
and oDC as it was my first client i used after nmdc...
ans still use oDC in the LAN... no need for hash.... ;p

PtokaX forum

Stuff => Offtopic => Topic started by: kash? on 04 August, 2005, 20:12:16