- RoboCop v4.0 - Testdrive 3 or Higher! - Page 64
 

News:

29 December 2022 - PtokaX 0.5.3.0 (20th anniversary edition) released...
11 April 2017 - PtokaX 0.5.2.2 released...
8 April 2015 Anti child and anti pedo pr0n scripts are not allowed anymore on this board!
28 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 for Windows 10 IoT released...
3 September 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.1 released...
16 August 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.2.0 released...
1 August 2015 - Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX ended. Clearly nobody want ADC support...
30 June 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.1.0 released...
30 April 2015 Crowdfunding for ADC protocol support in PtokaX
26 April 2015 New support hub!
20 February 2015 - PtokaX 0.5.0.3 released...
13 April 2014 - PtokaX 0.5.0.2 released...
23 March 2014 - PtokaX testing version 0.5.0.1 build 454 is available.
04 March 2014 - PtokaX.org sites were temporary down because of DDOS attacks and issues with hosting service provider.

Main Menu

- RoboCop v4.0 - Testdrive 3 or Higher!

Started by Optimus, 12 October, 2003, 23:07:26

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

LoTeK_

I've spoke with the creator of DCDM and he says that DCDM doesn't have full anti flood protection, but only a little bit...
?_? ?_?

LoTeK_

ehm...ehm... sorry, I didn't notice the link to the guide you posted.. ^_^
But the second part of my last post is still valid..

Quattro

#1577
hi optimus is it possible to implement that robocop sorts the topkickers by kicks?

By the way i haven't had any problems with other hubs yet using dcdm even surfnet accepts it :P just be honest to the op's and explain them what your client can do
quattro-place.no-ip.com:1418
PtokaX DC Hub 0.3.3.0 build 17.09 Not Running :(
wdp10.no-ip.info:1412
DCH++ v1.0-Release (Plugin API v1.0) Special Quattro? Build
For DCH scripting and plugins

Optimus

Quotehi optimus is it possible to implement that robocop sorts the topkickers by kicks?
Yes me noticed it to, it was supposed to sort lol. But it didn't. But offcourse that is now fixed Thanks :D

Optimus

QuoteIf the antiflood feature will be implemendet in future version of robocop I can stop to use all other clients and use only DC++ for me, and robocop for the hub.
I still suggest you use deflood from our dear friend Plop it's a script and it doesn't need a extra client. Maybe in near future i will put deflood in Add-On folder to.

Why a seperate deflood script? well it's just more easy to update etc.

LoTeK_

mhhm...you're right.

LoTeK_

I'm on the settings of Deflood and I found this:

-- don't check the next IP's on fake $ConnectToMe's
-- (for hub owners who are behind a NAT router)
tIPs = { ["127.0.0.1"] = 1, ["127.0.0.2"] = 1 }

and lately this:

   elseif strsub(data, 1, 12) == "$ConnectToMe" then
      local s,e,ip = strfind(data, "(%S+):%d+|$")
      if ip and tIPs[user.sIP] == nil then
         if ip ~= user.sIP then
            local s,e,dIP1,dIP2,dIP3,dIP4 = strfind(ip, "(%d+)%.(%d+)%.(%d+)%.(%d+)")
            dIP1 = (tonumber(dIP1) * 16777216) + (tonumber(dIP2) *65536) + (tonumber(dIP3) * 256) + (tonumber(dIP4))
            for a,b in tPriv do
               if dIP1 >= a and dIP1 <= b then
                  user:SendPM(Bot, "You either left the IP box from your active settings empty or you placed a private IP in there by accident!\r\n"..
                     "IP's like this will not resolve outside your local network, change it for "..user.sIP.."|")
                  user:Disconnect()
                  return 1
               end

normally (without using a router) active client must left the IP box empty, ?_? they will be kicked?

LoTeK_

metaphase... I'm now on your DCDM++ guide and when it comes DCDM++ window (the interesting part..), u have write 8.3 in the image, but there aren't any 8.3 explanations...lol.. u forgot something?
:-P

LoTeK_

thanks opti but my problem is not with ops.. op aren't checked by normal in this script, without adding anything..my problem is why it's written "You either left the IP box from your active settings empty or you placed a private IP in there by accident!" , the IP box must be left empty if u stay active..?_? normal clients will be kicked?

Optimus

Maybe try deflood4.2 works fine for me, it's fixed to work with RC.

deflood4.2

LoTeK_

Thanks.. this only checks unreged users?

Optimus


LoTeK_

mh, i'm using the deflood and I get this messages:
[19:34] <[Bot]-OpChat> 23 - 62.203.52.250 - 07/14/04 19:34:09 - banned for using a hub flooder!! (banned on nickname)
[19:43] <[Bot]-OpChat> 23 - 62.203.52.250 - 07/14/04 19:43:48 - banned for using a hub flooder!! (banned on nickname)
[20:50] <[Bot]-OpChat> 23 - 62.203.52.250 - 07/14/04 20:50:11 - banned for using a hub flooder!! (banned on nickname)
[21:04] <[Bot]-OpChat> 23 - 62.203.52.250 - 07/14/04 21:04:46 - banned for using a hub flooder!! (banned on nickname)
[21:29] <[Bot]-OpChat> 42 - 141.30.143.140 - 07/14/04 21:29:28 - banned for using a hub flooder!! (banned on nickname)

can u tell me something? I don't believe that "23" is an user, something is wrong? thanks

Optimus

nope all is ok, those flooders use numbers that's why

LoTeK_

but this only happen after I put the deflood. and those flooders are continuing to be kicked.. always the same numbers..

Optimus

Contact Plop about it, he can tell you all about it ;)

Thread Finished Scripts / Deflood

LoTeK_

ok now I'm put the last version of deflood, I've removed the $ConnectToMe feature..(I was getting my users banned..lol) and i'm emailing Plop my previous post with the numbers (I am starting giving the numbers  8o ..lol)
let's see what happens..
thanks

blackwings

QuoteOriginally posted by LoTeK_
ok now I'm put the last version of deflood, I've removed the $ConnectToMe feature..(I was getting my users banned..lol) and i'm emailing Plop my previous post with the numbers (I am starting giving the numbers  8o ..lol)
let's see what happens..
thanks

ya, haveing that function is as bad as a real flooder/hub-destroyer :P


Optimus

? Name: Flops
	 ? Profile: User
	 ? IP: xx.xx.xxx.xxx
	 ? Client: DCGUI
	 ? Version: 0.2.20
	 ? iVersion: 1,0091
	 ? Descr: [URL]http://dc.ketelhot.de[/URL]
	 ? Mode: Passive
	 ? Conn: Cable
	 ? E-Mail: email
	 ? Upload limit: Unlimited
	 ? Share: 3.52 GB

	 ? Kicked: No kicks
	 ? bWho: None
	 ? Reason: None
	 ? Warned: No warnings
	 ? bWho: None
	 ? Reason: None
	 ? Away Mess: No message
	 ? Connected at: N/A
	 ? Total Time: N/A
	 ? Session Time: N/A

	 ? Open Hub(s): 8
	 ? Open Slots: 3

Hehe found 1 even 2 today lolll ;)

LoTeK_

I'm not sure if it's a problem only for some versions of DCGUI, but I know for sure what my ops reported to me, and they can't enter with DCGUI, cause they get kicked for random reasons..

Optimus

QuoteI'm not sure if it's a problem only for some versions of DCGUI, but I know for sure what my ops reported to me, and they can't enter with DCGUI, cause they get kicked for random reasons..
Hehe i know, it's my new Beta that is running. Working verry well now ;)

Handyman

Hi there

Got a question, why does i get this message then i connect to my hub with OP as a prefix.

"The nick you are using is reserved for someone other. Change your nick and get back again."

Other users wich have OP status have no problem.
Im connecting with a internal ip 192.168....

Optimus

Quote"The nick you are using is reserved for someone other. Change your nick and get back again."
That's not a RoboCop message. maybe try 127.0.0.1

LoTeK_

Great!  :P
by the way, it's possible that some hublist pingers cannot connect with the rc maximum hubs on? (15)
Two days ago I stopped using scripted rules on ptokax and I put on the maximum hubs in rc.
The result (If it's caused by this..I don't know..) was that my hub disappeared from public list.. ?_?
maybe can be a bug of pto 15.25, don't know..

Optimus

duno, i have max hubs set here for ages and i'm on hublist for sure hehe

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk