0.3.4.0j

PPK · 28 May, 2006, 16:37:23

New testing version, maybe last before release

1 ) With Lua 5.0.2.
2 ) With Lua 5.1.

Full online PtokaX changelog is available in Wiki.

bastya_elvtars · 28 May, 2006, 16:52:24

Call the final 0.3.5.0, it is worth it.

PPK · 28 May, 2006, 17:37:39

Why not 0.4.0.0 ??? ;D

6Marilyn6Manson6 · 28 May, 2006, 17:50:04

Why not 1.0.0.0 hihiihihihih ;D ;D ;D ;D

bastya_elvtars · 28 May, 2006, 18:08:33

Quote from: PPK on 28 May, 2006, 17:37:39
Why not 0.4.0.0 ??? ;D

I did not wanna be impolite. :-)

Just wanted to suggest the usual versioning convention. :-)

Microversion=bugfix etc.

blackwings · 28 May, 2006, 19:17:37

PPK, could you explain what this does? =
Added: Max limit (16) for script bots to disalloq fake users.

PPK · 28 May, 2006, 20:03:59

On RegBot it check if here is already 16 scripted bots on hub, and if yes then not add it. I added it to disallow hubs (like the one on hublist.org running PtokaX and have 5000 users, but only 40 real) to fake users :

-SkA- · 28 May, 2006, 20:27:01

Quote from: PPK on 28 May, 2006, 20:03:59
On RegBot it check if here is already 16 scripted bots on hub, and if yes then not add it. I added it to disallow hubs (like the one on hublist.org running PtokaX and have 5000 users, but only 40 real) to fake users? :

LOL PPK: ssshhhh

;D ;D

-SkA- · 28 May, 2006, 20:33:44

Talking seriously: it's a hublist.org pinger problem, not Ptokax.

That pinger checks also BOTs.....others hublist (as dreamland) don't do that.

GeceBekcisi · 28 May, 2006, 20:47:07

Other hublists doesn't ping your hub as hublist.org does,
they retrieve your user count if you enable hublist registration in PtokaX
and PtokaX reports only real users to hublists..

That's absolutely not a honest way -SkA-, you know it...

But, if someone wants to fake users; script bots is not the only way..

Though, thanks PPK, for this step against fakers

-SkA- · 29 May, 2006, 07:50:09

Quote from: GeceBekcisi on 28 May, 2006, 20:47:07
Other hublists doesn't ping your hub as hublist.org does,
they retrieve your user count if you enable hublist registration in PtokaX
and PtokaX reports only real users to hublists..

That's absolutely not a honest way -SkA-, you know it...

I perfectly know that's not correct.

Come on guys, It was only a try to re-populate my hub since it was included in that list and thanks to that bad person I lost all my users.

btw, now "fake-hub" is closed.

GeceBekcisi · 29 May, 2006, 08:31:06

Some of my users complained about the stuff below, and switching back to 0.3.4.0i solved that..

What may be wrong PPK?

[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:18] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:20] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:20] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:57:40] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[09:57:40] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:59:41] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[09:59:41] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[10:01:58] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[10:02:20] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)

-SkA- · 29 May, 2006, 08:35:22

It also happened to me one day with d1 : an hub restart solved the problem...

Take also note there was a bandwidth issue on my server that day.

GeceBekcisi · 29 May, 2006, 11:50:54

Yeah, hub restart resolves for a while, but users start bitching again.. We were being DDoS'ed since last 12 hrs; so I'll check if these happen while we're being attacked

GeceBekcisi · 29 May, 2006, 12:00:50

What's interesting is, we ARE being DDoS'ed at the moment too but with 0.3.4.0i0, no one receives search spam..

PPK · 29 May, 2006, 14:35:06

I checked all changes from i to j and here is no change related to deflood

GeceBekcisi · 29 May, 2006, 14:45:54

I didnt blame deflood functionality for search spams; we were being flooded or DDoS'ed by spoofed, type 3 ICMP packets.

And what I was trying to say was 0.3.4.0i0 didn't lag searches where 0.3.4.0j0 did.

blackwings · 29 May, 2006, 16:05:49

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 14:35:06
I checked all changes from i to j and here is no change related to deflood

isn't it possible that you made something wrong when you did these changes? =

Fixed: Not working "no main chat deflood" and "no private message deflood" for multiline messages (thx ']['yphoon? for report).
Fixed: Crash on bad $SR returned to UDP.
Changed: Complete rewrite of data queues.

PPK · 29 May, 2006, 17:01:22

These changes are already included in i version :

Quote from: GeceBekcisi on 29 May, 2006, 14:45:54
And what I was trying to say was 0.3.4.0i0 didn't lag searches where 0.3.4.0j0 did.

Both have same interval to send searches, and no changes from i to j :

blackwings · 29 May, 2006, 17:11:24

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 17:01:22
These changes are already included in i version :

I know, what I meant was that maybe you made something wrong when you made those changes.

bastya_elvtars · 29 May, 2006, 19:18:36

FYI, ICMP has nothing to do with active search results.

PPK · 29 May, 2006, 21:36:25

I am check 3 times changes from i to j, and no change related to search requests found

I am check things related to search and everything looks ok.
GeceBekcisi from what client is this log, and running this client in passive or active mode ??? (looks like passive because all search spams are active) :

Is here any log of data received by client from hub ??? It looks like in DC++ is spam more than 7 searches in 5 seconds

blackwings · 29 May, 2006, 21:42:20

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 21:36:25
I am check 3 times changes from i to j, and no change related to search requests found
I am check things related to search and everything looks ok.

GeceBekcisi said he also notice this in i,
so check for things changed between h - i ( or ad - i).

ConejoDelMal · 29 May, 2006, 21:54:09

i think the problem is not search related, but cpu and memory consumption, I also just got a lot of search spam warnings, as I checked the server, ptokax was using 98% of my cpu, and over 390.000K of memory.

*edited
running j1

GeceBekcisi · 29 May, 2006, 22:03:31

Quote from: bastya_elvtars on 29 May, 2006, 19:18:36
FYI, ICMP has nothing to do with active search results.

Yeah that's true; unless they flow to my server like crazy and cause my server to lag..

Quote from: PPK on 29 May, 2006, 21:36:25
GeceBekcisi from what client is this log, and running this client in passive or active mode? ??? (looks like passive because all search spams are active)? : Is here any log of data received by client from hub ??? It looks like in DC++ is spam more than 7 searches in 5 seconds

This log belongs to DC++ 0.674 as well as many other versions (my operators got reports from lots of people; those happened while I was away). This client is running in active mode. I don't have any log except the log above since I didn't experience that. Any more questions?

Quote from: blackwings on 29 May, 2006, 21:42:20
GeceBekcisi said he also notice this in i, so check for things changed between h - i ( or ad - i).

I think that's just a coincidence; I don't blame 0.3.4.0j0 at all...

Quote from: ConejoDelMal on 29 May, 2006, 21:54:09
i think the problem is not search related, but cpu and memory consumption, I also just got a lot of search spam warnings, as I checked the server, ptokax was using 98% of my cpu, and over 390.000K of memory.

*edited
running j1

Couldn't agree more; but as I said before it's interesting that 0.3.4.0i0 didn't cause that under the same conditions..

PtokaX forum

News:

0.3.4.0j

PPK

bastya_elvtars

PPK

6Marilyn6Manson6

bastya_elvtars

blackwings

PPK

-SkA-

-SkA-

GeceBekcisi

-SkA-

GeceBekcisi

-SkA-

GeceBekcisi

GeceBekcisi

PPK

GeceBekcisi

blackwings

PPK

blackwings

bastya_elvtars

PPK

blackwings

ConejoDelMal

GeceBekcisi