Author Topic: 0.3.4.0j  (Read 12272 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PPK

  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 481
  • Karma: +209/-22
  • PtokaX developer
0.3.4.0j
« on: 28 May, 2006, 16:37:23 »
New testing version, maybe last before release :P
1 ) With Lua 5.0.2.
2 ) With Lua 5.1.

Full online PtokaX changelog is available in Wiki.
« Last Edit: 28 May, 2006, 16:39:29 by PPK »
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

PtokaX forum

0.3.4.0j
« on: 28 May, 2006, 16:37:23 »

Offline bastya_elvtars

  • Forum God
  • ****
  • Posts: 3 752
  • Karma: +173/-7
  • The rock n' roll doctor
    • The FreshStuff3 Site
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #1 on: 28 May, 2006, 16:52:24 »
Call the final 0.3.5.0, it is worth it.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Offline PPK

  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 481
  • Karma: +209/-22
  • PtokaX developer
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #2 on: 28 May, 2006, 17:37:39 »
Why not 0.4.0.0  ??? ;D
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

Offline 6Marilyn6Manson6

  • Scripter
  • King
  • ******
  • Posts: 869
  • Karma: +47/-35
    • http://www.marilynmanson986.altervista.org
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #3 on: 28 May, 2006, 17:50:04 »
Why not 1.0.0.0 hihiihihihih  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline bastya_elvtars

  • Forum God
  • ****
  • Posts: 3 752
  • Karma: +173/-7
  • The rock n' roll doctor
    • The FreshStuff3 Site
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #4 on: 28 May, 2006, 18:08:33 »
Why not 0.4.0.0  ??? ;D

I did not wanna be impolite. :-)

Just wanted to suggest the usual versioning convention. :-)

Microversion=bugfix etc.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Offline blackwings

  • Scripter
  • King
  • ******
  • Posts: 986
  • Karma: +12/-8
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #5 on: 28 May, 2006, 19:17:37 »
PPK, could you explain what this does? =
Added: Max limit (16) for script bots to disalloq fake users.


Offline PPK

  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 481
  • Karma: +209/-22
  • PtokaX developer
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #6 on: 28 May, 2006, 20:03:59 »
On RegBot it check if here is already 16 scripted bots on hub, and if yes then not add it. I added it to disallow hubs (like the one on hublist.org running PtokaX and have 5000 users, but only 40 real) to fake users  ::)
« Last Edit: 28 May, 2006, 20:22:50 by PPK »
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

Offline -SkA-

  • Double Ace
  • *
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: +24/-2
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #7 on: 28 May, 2006, 20:27:01 »
On RegBot it check if here is already 16 scripted bots on hub, and if yes then not add it. I added it to disallow hubs (like the one on hublist.org running PtokaX and have 5000 users, but only 40 real) to fake users? ::)

LOL PPK: ssshhhh  :-X  :-X      ;D  ;D
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

Offline -SkA-

  • Double Ace
  • *
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: +24/-2
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #8 on: 28 May, 2006, 20:33:44 »
Talking seriously: it's a hublist.org pinger problem, not Ptokax.

That pinger checks also BOTs.....others hublist (as dreamland) don't do that.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

Offline GeceBekcisi

  • Scripter
  • Lord
  • ******
  • Posts: 311
  • Karma: +10/-1
  • You don't need eyes to see, you need vision..
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #9 on: 28 May, 2006, 20:47:07 »
Other hublists doesn't ping your hub as hublist.org does,
they retrieve your user count if you enable hublist registration in PtokaX
and PtokaX reports only real users to hublists..

That's absolutely not a honest way -SkA-, you know it...


But, if someone wants to fake users; script bots is not the only way..



Though, thanks PPK, for this step against fakers  ;)
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

Offline -SkA-

  • Double Ace
  • *
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: +24/-2
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #10 on: 29 May, 2006, 07:50:09 »
Other hublists doesn't ping your hub as hublist.org does,
they retrieve your user count if you enable hublist registration in PtokaX
and PtokaX reports only real users to hublists..

That's absolutely not a honest way -SkA-, you know it...

I perfectly know that's not correct.

Come on guys, It was only a try to re-populate my hub since it was included in that list and thanks to that bad person I lost all my users.

btw, now "fake-hub" is closed.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

Offline GeceBekcisi

  • Scripter
  • Lord
  • ******
  • Posts: 311
  • Karma: +10/-1
  • You don't need eyes to see, you need vision..
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #11 on: 29 May, 2006, 08:31:06 »
Some of my users complained about the stuff below, and switching back to 0.3.4.0i solved that..

What may be wrong PPK?

Code: [Select]
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:15] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:54:16] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:16] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:18] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:20] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:20] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:56:21] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:57:40] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[09:57:40] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:24] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[09:58:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[09:59:41] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[09:59:41] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 213.250.11.130:19889 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 85.178.16.223:666 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 212.54.11.36:7650 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:25] *** Detected search spam from: 60.48.108.222:14375 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 67.70.91.186:18778 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 195.174.63.14:26656 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 83.250.89.185:7143 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 82.72.120.41:444 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 85.105.70.155:11700 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 218.174.159.93:4505 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:27] *** Detected search spam from: 203.217.36.227:22865 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 85.101.198.162:8001 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 87.17.125.42:9357 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 24.155.98.160:4923 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 85.226.42.166:6600 (Nick Unknown)
[10:00:28] *** Detected search spam from: 160.75.114.195:8303 (Nick Unknown)
[10:01:58] *** Detected search spam from: 85.108.194.17:13539 (Nick Unknown)
[10:02:20] *** Detected search spam from: 84.52.136.7:1411 (Nick Unknown)
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

Offline -SkA-

  • Double Ace
  • *
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: +24/-2
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #12 on: 29 May, 2006, 08:35:22 »
It also happened to me one day with d1 : an hub restart solved the problem...

Take also note there was a bandwidth issue on my server that day.
???:::??x??em?-N????:::??? ?wN??

BrianzaLand Blog" style="border:0

Offline GeceBekcisi

  • Scripter
  • Lord
  • ******
  • Posts: 311
  • Karma: +10/-1
  • You don't need eyes to see, you need vision..
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #13 on: 29 May, 2006, 11:50:54 »
Yeah, hub restart resolves for a while, but users start bitching again.. We were being DDoS'ed since last 12 hrs; so I'll check if these happen while we're being attacked
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

Offline GeceBekcisi

  • Scripter
  • Lord
  • ******
  • Posts: 311
  • Karma: +10/-1
  • You don't need eyes to see, you need vision..
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #14 on: 29 May, 2006, 12:00:50 »
What's interesting is, we ARE being DDoS'ed at the moment too but with 0.3.4.0i0, no one receives search spam..   :o
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

Offline PPK

  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 481
  • Karma: +209/-22
  • PtokaX developer
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #15 on: 29 May, 2006, 14:35:06 »
I checked all changes from i to j and here is no change related to deflood  :(
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

Offline GeceBekcisi

  • Scripter
  • Lord
  • ******
  • Posts: 311
  • Karma: +10/-1
  • You don't need eyes to see, you need vision..
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #16 on: 29 May, 2006, 14:45:54 »
I didnt blame deflood functionality for search spams; we were being flooded or DDoS'ed by spoofed, type 3 ICMP packets.

And what I was trying to say was 0.3.4.0i0 didn't lag searches where 0.3.4.0j0 did.
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

Offline blackwings

  • Scripter
  • King
  • ******
  • Posts: 986
  • Karma: +12/-8
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #17 on: 29 May, 2006, 16:05:49 »
I checked all changes from i to j and here is no change related to deflood  :(
isn't it possible that you made something wrong when you did these changes? =

Fixed: Not working "no main chat deflood" and "no private message deflood" for multiline messages (thx ']['yphoon? for report).
Fixed: Crash on bad $SR returned to UDP.
Changed: Complete rewrite of data queues.


Offline PPK

  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 481
  • Karma: +209/-22
  • PtokaX developer
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #18 on: 29 May, 2006, 17:01:22 »
These changes are already included in i version  ::)

And what I was trying to say was 0.3.4.0i0 didn't lag searches where 0.3.4.0j0 did.
Both have same interval to send searches, and no changes from i to j  ::)
« Last Edit: 29 May, 2006, 17:15:05 by PPK »
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

Offline blackwings

  • Scripter
  • King
  • ******
  • Posts: 986
  • Karma: +12/-8
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #19 on: 29 May, 2006, 17:11:24 »
These changes are already included in i version  ::)
I know, what I meant was that maybe you made something wrong when you made those changes.


Offline bastya_elvtars

  • Forum God
  • ****
  • Posts: 3 752
  • Karma: +173/-7
  • The rock n' roll doctor
    • The FreshStuff3 Site
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #20 on: 29 May, 2006, 19:18:36 »
FYI, ICMP has nothing to do with active search results.
Everything could have been anything else and it would have just as much meaning.

Offline PPK

  • Administrator
  • Emperor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1 481
  • Karma: +209/-22
  • PtokaX developer
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #21 on: 29 May, 2006, 21:36:25 »
I am check 3 times changes from i to j, and no change related to search requests found :(
I am check things related to search and everything looks ok.
GeceBekcisi from what client is this log, and running this client in passive or active mode  ??? (looks like passive because all search spams are active)  ::) Is here any log of data received by client from hub ??? It looks like in DC++ is spam more than 7 searches in 5 seconds :o
« Last Edit: 29 May, 2006, 21:39:09 by PPK »
"Most of you are familiar with the virtues of a programmer. There are three, of course: laziness, impatience, and hubris." - Larry Wall

Offline blackwings

  • Scripter
  • King
  • ******
  • Posts: 986
  • Karma: +12/-8
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #22 on: 29 May, 2006, 21:42:20 »
I am check 3 times changes from i to j, and no change related to search requests found :(
I am check things related to search and everything looks ok.
GeceBekcisi said he also notice this in i,
so check for things changed between h - i ( or ad - i).


Offline ConejoDelMal

  • Triple Ace
  • **
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #23 on: 29 May, 2006, 21:54:09 »
i think the problem is not search related, but cpu and memory consumption, I also just got a lot of search spam warnings, as I checked the server, ptokax was using 98% of my cpu, and over 390.000K of memory.

*edited
running j1
Rede-DC Comunidade Portuguesa de DC

Offline GeceBekcisi

  • Scripter
  • Lord
  • ******
  • Posts: 311
  • Karma: +10/-1
  • You don't need eyes to see, you need vision..
Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #24 on: 29 May, 2006, 22:03:31 »
FYI, ICMP has nothing to do with active search results.

Yeah that's true; unless they flow to my server like crazy and cause my server to lag..


GeceBekcisi from what client is this log, and running this client in passive or active mode? ??? (looks like passive because all search spams are active)? ::) Is here any log of data received by client from hub ??? It looks like in DC++ is spam more than 7 searches in 5 seconds :o

This log belongs to DC++ 0.674 as well as many other versions (my operators got reports from lots of people; those happened while I was away). This client is running in active mode. I don't have any log except the log above since I didn't experience that. Any more questions?


GeceBekcisi said he also notice this in i, so check for things changed between h - i ( or ad - i).

I think that's just a coincidence; I don't blame 0.3.4.0j0 at all...


i think the problem is not search related, but cpu and memory consumption, I also just got a lot of search spam warnings, as I checked the server, ptokax was using 98% of my cpu, and over 390.000K of memory.

*edited
running j1

Couldn't agree more; but as I said before it's interesting that 0.3.4.0i0 didn't cause that under the same conditions..
Do you need an advanced user handling script? Download UserBekcisi today (Latest Edit)
Features: User + ISP + GeoIP database, user info + share checking and many more...

PtokaX forum

Re: 0.3.4.0j
« Reply #24 on: 29 May, 2006, 22:03:31 »