- RoboCop v4.0 - Testdrive 3 or Higher!

[Fifide2e]

[10:48] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:48] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:48] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\RoboCopv10.01b.lua:511: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\RoboCopv10.01b.lua:511: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:49] Robocop\RoboCopv10.01b.lua:511: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:50] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:50] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:50] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:50] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:50] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:50] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:51] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:51] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:51] Robocop\RoboCopv10.01b.lua:511: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:51] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)

Help please?

[uffetjur]

Still waiting for a better ISP handling with IP-ranges

[Nada@WTB]

Originally posted by Pothead
My client is now autokicking No Tags, and DC++ less than 0.3.  Is this part broke, or do you need to change the PtokaX setting to enable this now ?

same here, I just turned on the Ptokax checks to try and stop em from getting in, it just started this with RoboCop 10.01b

[Optimus]

My client is now autokicking No Tags, and DC++ less than 0.3. Is this part broke, or do you need to change the PtokaX setting to enable this now ?

Yups me found what causing it, it's the new redirect code that is not disconnecting fast enough.
Thanks for the report

[Optimus]

[10:48] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)
[10:48] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)

You haven't done a fresh install, a file called slotsratio.tbl is the problem it's changed/different this version.

[Optimus]

Still waiting for a better ISP handling with IP-ranges

These are mainly all bugs that are fixed, new features are on there way in newer versions.  

^^^ You need to read better next time, where still in bug fix fase

- Optimus

[Andoz]

Originally posted by Anna

Originally posted by jiten

Have u disabled the "Enable register tag/prefix" in the Robocop 10.x GUI for the profiles u don't want to have that prefix when registering? (In this case, the VIP profile)

Best regards.

Thing is I want VIP to have reg tag, only profile that should have it. I have it set so ops can reg and it still ends up right, even if they didnt know what tag they should use...

But there are always ops that check already regged to see how a vip should be regged so they do it !regvip [VIP]nick and result ends up as [VIP][VIP]nick

On previous version I could have reg tag enabled for vip and even if an op did !regvip [VIP] nick it still got the same result as if they would have done !regvip nick

The result in both cases was [VIP]nick in 9.0g no matter if it was done: !regvip nick or !regvip [VIP]nick

This is the way I wanted to get back... to be sure all vips get one and only one tag

Anna just reg them as !regvip Nick and they get the [VIP]  automatic
Or remove the mark register tag/prefix in robocob.exe under profiles Vip

[Pothead]

Originally posted by Optimus

2) Allow to change or disabe user connect "settings profile" message on login because if regged get the userclientinfo.lua, unregged users get

Welcome User ruspant to Ceam Raiders have a good time.
Settings Profile User - Minshare: 0 GB, Minslots: none, Maxslots: none, Slotsratio: none, Maxhubs: none

even if I uncheck "enable client info on connect"

This is done because it takes more bandwidth if info is send to all none-regged connecting users

I think what he is saying, is that these messages cannot be turned off anymore.

[Anna]

I know very well that I can do it that way, just pointing out it wasnt needed in previus version, result was the same if it was done either way...

old way is prefered since I'm not the only one that regs, so as is now no matter what I set (tag enabled or not) it will be wrong somewhere when another op does reg a vip..

If I remove tag auto i will prolly end up with VIPs that dont show as vip, if I enable it I will prolly end up with double taged VIPs

[Dessamator]

hmm optimus , why dont u create a simple program to update the previous robocop version?, its tiresome to change everything each time a new version is created, just an idea

[Caduceus]

I think what he is saying, is that these messages cannot be turned off anymore.

I think what he is saying, is that the logon-infomsg (shown for regs and up) is not showing for non-regs/simple-users.

Optimus states that this is because of bandwidth-saving. However... there is no build-in choice to show it to them anyway (with the cost of some more traffic).

I would like to have that to be a possibility, please.

[Optimus]

I know very well that I can do it that way, just pointing out it wasnt needed in previus version, result was the same if it was done either way...

old way is prefered since I'm not the only one that regs, so as is now no matter what I set (tag enabled or not) it will be wrong somewhere when another op does reg a vip..

If I remove tag auto i will prolly end up with VIPs that dont show as vip, if I enable it I will prolly end up with double taged VIPs

I have no probs with auto tag have you tryed new version did some changes

- Optimus

[lynyrd]

Zitat:
------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Dessamator

Zitat:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hmm optimus , why dont u create a simple program to update the previous robocop version?, its tiresome to change everything each time a new version is created, just an idea
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

please! optimus *on my knees begging* ;)

btw the last version rocks!
and i have a little request..the offline funktion is only for op's. but could you make it so everone can use it?

[Optimus]

and i have a little request..the offline funktion is only for op's. but could you make it so everone can use it?

Yes possible i had allready planned to make a new offline system

- Optimus

[lynyrd]

sounds promising..
and one moore request
it would be nice if the showreg command could
show all profiles. example: !showreg all
if i remember right it was like that in the earlier versions.
cya

[Bobby1999]

Cheers,all working fine here including 2 trivias+jumble etc(thanks Jelf)
Gr8 script Opti:)

[night_hawk]

in the new verion you make you will add the chat room i was talking bout...meaning to log in and out...and this i my get a no one can you add fun scripts to it like trivia and jokes and other games ...if not that is cool just a thought...just want the chatroom fixed thats all i know you siad you would...thank yuo for the best hub so fare...

[tassen]

I got an error.
[20:33:11] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)

running 16.06 and 10.01b

Regards Tassen

[Madman]

Originally posted by tassen
I got an error.
[20:33:11] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to index field `?' (a number value)

running 16.06 and 10.01b

Regards Tassen

Originally posted by Optimus
You haven't done a fresh install, a file called slotsratio.tbl is the problem it's changed/different this version.

[gazzer]

Originally posted by night_hawk
in the new verion you make you will add the chat room i was talking bout...meaning to log in and out...and this i my get a no one can you add fun scripts to it like trivia and jokes and other games ...if not that is cool just a thought...just want the chatroom fixed thats all i know you siad you would...thank yuo for the best hub so fare...

i can give ya triv now as have fully working lua5 version with massive question pack

[night_hawk]

cool i have a chat room bot can use change that over to the new scripting for me my email is night_hawk1977@hotmail.com

[tassen]

I have now done a fresh install, but still this problem is
[08:25:31] Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to compare number with table

Running 16.06 and 10.01b

Regards Tassen

[Madman]

Originally posted by tassen
I have now done a fresh install, but still this problem is
[08:25:31] <•Robocop•> Robocop\DataArrival.lua:37: attempt to compare number with table

Running 16.06 and 10.01b

Regards Tassen

Are you sure you removed the 10.01a lua file? beacuse i got that error when i forgot to delete the a file ;p

[tassen]

Yes i have to look one more time and i hade this 10.01a lua removed.

But anyway is it possible for you Optimus write an log file over the files is changed from an version to an other ?

Its saves a lot of work if i not nead to re enter every information in robocop again!

Regards Tassen

[Pothead]

Originally posted by tassen
But anyway is it possible for you Optimus write an log file over the files is changed from an version to an other ?

Use WinMerge to compare the files, to see which have changed.